![]() |
|
||||
updated 6 August 04' |
|||||
Non-Motorized Trails & Pathways Department of Natural Resources
|
|
Tool Kit Contents
Click here for a printer-friendly version of this document.
If you have any questions about this page, please don't hesitate to contact me.XXX
-Fred Hayes, P&R
|
|||
|
The purpose of this section is to provide information and boilerplate language that will help to provide a basic understanding of the issue by factually describing the issue, its scope, and dimensions. Options & Trade-Offs Demand for non-motorized trails, pathways and open space is on the rise across the State. In 2002, Utah State University 's Institute for Outdoor Recreation and Tourism performed a statewide opinion survey to determine trail issues and needs by planning districts or regions of the state. The study revealed strong support and use levels of trails in all areas of Utah . Among other things, the study found that trail use is very much a family affair in Utah; 4 of 5 trail users say they have benefited personally from trails; hiking is the most frequent trail activity (71 percent); and 80 percent of trail users agree there are economic benefits from trails. In general, many of these same issues apply to a given county. Potential for Conflict While the uses of non-motorized trails, pathways and open space are fairly “clean” activities; there are a number of financial and other impacts. There are initial costs to trail development and open space acquisition. These features and activities frequently require property acquisition and facility development. There is a certain amount of liability regarding the construction (e.g., established standards), maintenance and removal of hazards associated with these facilities and activities. There will be costs associated with the operation and maintenance of these resources. There can be impacts on community infrastructure too. There can be increased search and rescue needs, and impacts on the community's ability to provide sanitation, water, food, and lodging for visitors. Range of Alternatives The following are some major management objectives identified in the 2003 State Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan (SCORP) concerning the development and implementation of non-motorized trails, pathways and open space. These recommendations were identified by public participants in eight regional trail planning meetings held during the fall and winter of 2000. Counties may consider these guiding principles with implementation of non-motorized trails, pathways and open space program: Encourage business growth and vitality by attracting highly competent professionals to the state Facilitate closer cooperation and collaboration with the Utah Department of Transportation and State Highway Commission in their highway planning and special enhancement programs Encourage local planners and developers to incorporate innovative open space and pathway designs into subdivisions and commercial developments Support program objectives of Envision Utah, the 21 st Century Cities Program, the Quality Growth Commission objectives , Community Impact Board efforts, while implementing high priority trail development (see www.envisionutah.org ; www.qualitygrowth.utah.gov/ ). Collaborate with other state and federal agencies to implement trails and urban pathways, such as with the Alliance for Cardiovascular Health, Community Fitness and others to measure and assess physical and mental benefits Help local trail sponsors craft clean, well designed, and easy-to-maintain trails and trailheads for their grant applications. Poor projects should not be funded with limited grants These objectives may be used as guidelines to help obtain planning and development project funds under a variety of state and federal grant programs.
The purpose of this section is to provide information and boilerplate language that will help to describe the existing condition. Data Review Counties are strongly advised to review the SCORP. Is there anything else? Items to Consider In describing the Existing Condition, the author should address… (opportunity costs). Boilerplate Language
Desired Future ConditionThe purpose of this section is to provide information and boilerplate language that will help to describe the improvements and changes that need to be made to the existing condition in order to achieve the desired future condition. It also provides the basis for the development of policy statements that support the desired future condition. Range of Alternatives Counties should consider their desired role in providing opportunities and facilities for these activities. They should move to protect public access to existing trails and open space, and to potential locations. They should be leaders in promoting the coordination, cooperation and partnering of all entities that provide these opportunities. It makes sense that the counties lead the way in connecting the opportunities that are available from the various agencies and communities within each county and surrounding area. Are there any more alternative future conditions? Boilerplate Language We also need to link this to the “items to consider” list. Can you site examples of a desired future condition.
Policy and Position StatementsThe purpose of this section is to provide boilerplate policy statement language that will support the desired future conditions. A range of possible conditions is provided here. Boilerplate Language The following are some major objectives identified in the 2003 State Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan (SCORP) concerning the development and implementation of non-motorized trails, pathways and open space. These recommendations were identified by public participants in eight regional trail planning meetings held during the fall and winter of 2000. Counties may consider these guiding principles with implementation of non-motorized trails, pathways and open space program:
These objectives may be used as guidelines to help obtain planning and development project funds under a variety of state and federal grant programs. For instance, the Utah State Parks Non-motorized Trail Program administers funds that are available to municipalities, counties, and state and federal agencies as matching fiscal assistance grants for planning, acquisition and development of non-motorized trails and pathways. While funding for this program has been reduced considerably in recent times, it has helped fund important trail projects throughout the state in communities and on public lands, and still has limited opportunities to provide funding support. The Utah Department of Transportation Enhancement Program can provide funding for bicycle and pedestrian facilities.
Goals, Objectives, and/or Action ItemsThe purpose of this section is to provide boilerplate examples of the types of improvements or changes that typically would be needed to reach the desired future condition. “Goal” is the desired condition. “Objectives” are improvements or changes that need to be made to reach the goal. “Action Items” are specific actions that can be taken in order to achieve the objective. Goal (Desired Future Condition) The “Objectives” should be improvements that can be made. Action Items
Monitoring Methods and MechanismsThe purpose of this section is to provide suggested techniques and methods for monitoring progress towards the desired condition. How does a county monitor the effectiveness of their planning efforts for non-motorized trails?
Sources and Resources to AssistThis section is intended to be a reference guide to help locate any sources of assistance. Utah State Parks
For trail toolbox that includes trails 101 and information on safety and impacts, laws and ordinances, trail acquisition, mapping and funding For funding and grant information. Utah Department of Transportation
Envision Utah
Utah Quality Growth Commission For benefits and impacts of trails and open space. Utah State University
Federal Highway Administration
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials
National Park Service
American Trails Source for economic and health impacts and benefits of recreational trails and greenways, and connection to user groups. American Hiking Society Source for economic and health impacts and benefits of recreational trails and greenways, and connection to user groups. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Provides of information on health benefits of trails and recreation. Cardiovascular Alliance Provides information on health benefits of walking and trails. Other land management agencies can provide information and expertise about trail and open space issues. They can provide information on trails and open space under their jurisdiction and join partnerships to enhance the counties' economic climate and promote healthy lifestyles by increasing the availability of trails and open space. Similarly, other Municipal and County Planning Departments can share expertise and past experiences dealing with these issues.
|
|||||